Cow is not mata (just like Bharat is not mata); it's meat growing on four legs.
We humans are also meat growing on two legs, but we are meat with sensibility who seek 'equality' and 'rights'. All kinds of meat are equal, but some kinds are more equal than others. It's a very fleshy and sinewy philosophy of 'progressivism'.
The 'progress' in 'progressivism' is the Greek or Latin root-word for either 'beef' or 'mutton'. And we all know what 'ism' is; don't we? I mean 'ism' as in Marx-'ism', femin-'ism', egalitarian-'ism', malaprop-'ism', Hindu-'ism', kapil-'ism', etc.
(If you are reading this post, you are engaging in a bit of kapil-'ism'.)
So meat is pretty central to the philosophy of 'progressivism' which fights against the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical fascism, supremacism, racism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, chauvinism, misogyny, patriarchy, etc. in order to bring about 'equality' and 'rights' for all kinds of meat found on Earth.
The meat of the matter is that we've got to fight the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat of the most rotten kind in order to establish 'equality' on Earth.
Sometimes we can witness some kinds of meat covered in black robes in order to fight the aforementioned meat of the most rotten kind. It's all part of the game. Handling different kinds of meat is, of course, a subtle and delicate art.
No less subtle and delicate is the art of sniffing out the rotten meat. Sometimes the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat (of the most rotten kind) disguises itself as perfectly mouth-watering and 'progressive' kind of meat (like 'mutton dressed as lamb' sans the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical misogyny and male chauvinism latent in this English phrase).
The nauseating Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat is also known to have the capacity for contaminating, sometimes, the well established and widely regarded meat of the most 'progressive' kind.
I don't feel too comfortable, for instance, with the tweet as well as the article copied below for some reason (even though both seem to originate in quite well-known progressive kinds of meat). Do give it a thorough read for any signs of loathsome meat of the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical kind.
Thanks.
--------------
We humans are also meat growing on two legs, but we are meat with sensibility who seek 'equality' and 'rights'. All kinds of meat are equal, but some kinds are more equal than others. It's a very fleshy and sinewy philosophy of 'progressivism'.
The 'progress' in 'progressivism' is the Greek or Latin root-word for either 'beef' or 'mutton'. And we all know what 'ism' is; don't we? I mean 'ism' as in Marx-'ism', femin-'ism', egalitarian-'ism', malaprop-'ism', Hindu-'ism', kapil-'ism', etc.
(If you are reading this post, you are engaging in a bit of kapil-'ism'.)
So meat is pretty central to the philosophy of 'progressivism' which fights against the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical fascism, supremacism, racism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, chauvinism, misogyny, patriarchy, etc. in order to bring about 'equality' and 'rights' for all kinds of meat found on Earth.
The meat of the matter is that we've got to fight the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat of the most rotten kind in order to establish 'equality' on Earth.
Sometimes we can witness some kinds of meat covered in black robes in order to fight the aforementioned meat of the most rotten kind. It's all part of the game. Handling different kinds of meat is, of course, a subtle and delicate art.
No less subtle and delicate is the art of sniffing out the rotten meat. Sometimes the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat (of the most rotten kind) disguises itself as perfectly mouth-watering and 'progressive' kind of meat (like 'mutton dressed as lamb' sans the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical misogyny and male chauvinism latent in this English phrase).
The nauseating Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical meat is also known to have the capacity for contaminating, sometimes, the well established and widely regarded meat of the most 'progressive' kind.
I don't feel too comfortable, for instance, with the tweet as well as the article copied below for some reason (even though both seem to originate in quite well-known progressive kinds of meat). Do give it a thorough read for any signs of loathsome meat of the Hindu-Right Wing-Manuvadi-Brahmanical kind.
Thanks.
--------------
https://twitter.com/jasonhickel/status/1079697213708734464
Jason Hickel
@jasonhickel
Pondering #NewYearsResolutions in an age of climate breakdown? Here are three easy ones:
1) Switch your home (and workplace!) to a clean energy provider.
2) Liberate your diet from beef and lamb.
3) Move your money to a fossil-free bank (in the UK: Nationwide, Triodos, Co-Op).
3:14 AM - 31 Dec 2018
---------
Jason Hickel
@jasonhickel
Pondering #NewYearsResolutions in an age of climate breakdown? Here are three easy ones:
1) Switch your home (and workplace!) to a clean energy provider.
2) Liberate your diet from beef and lamb.
3) Move your money to a fossil-free bank (in the UK: Nationwide, Triodos, Co-Op).
3:14 AM - 31 Dec 2018
---------
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-beef-millions-slash-emissions-wef.html
Drop beef and save millions of lives, slash emissions: WEF
January 3, 2019, Phys.org
Switching from beef to alternative proteins could save millions of lives and dramatically slash greenhouse gas emissions, the World Economic Forum said Thursday.
New research conducted by the Oxford Martin School for WEF showed that efforts to replace meat and especially beef could provide huge benefits for human health and the environment.
The organisation, famous for the plush gathering of the world's rich, famous and influential at the luxury Swiss ski resort of Davos each January, said 2.4 percent of global diet-related deaths could be avoided by moving away from beef.
And for wealthier countries, a full five percent of such deaths could be avoided, according to the shool's white paper "Alternative proteins".
"The most positive effects are found in wealthier countries, where beef consumption is high and where there is a particular benefit of consuming more fibre," it found.
The paper did not provide figures on how many people are estimated to die annually from diet-related causes, nor what diseases or conditions were included in that category, but WEF maintained that switching from meat "could prevent millions of unnecessary deaths per year."
It also pointed out that demand for meat is projected to keep growing even as the global population is predicted to swell to 10 billion around the middle of this century.
Not sustainable
"It will be impossible to sustainably satisfy the world's future demand for meat," WEF managing director Dominic Waughray said in the statement.
He stressed that "innovation in products, improvements in how we produce beef, pork and chicken, and an effort on the part of the consumer to embrace a more diverse diet," could make it possible to improve global health, even without giving up meat altogether.
The report analysed 13 sources of protein, including beef, pork and chicken, along with fruits and vegetables such as beans, processed non-animal substitutes like tofu, and novel products including insects.
It found that switching from meat to alternative proteins could have both a negative and a positive effect on nutrient intake, but that overall, increasing consumption of alternatives offered health improvements.
Beans, mycoprotein and peas offered the biggest health boost, with the possibility to reduce mortality rates by up to seven percent, it found.
The white paper also highlighted 2010 data showing that beef production alone accounts for a quarter of all food-related greenhouse gas emissions, stressing that soaring protein demand could put huge pressure on the environment unless alternatives are found.
Livestock farming poses a triple threat to Earth's atmosphere, as animals produce huge amounts of the greenhouse gas methane, coupled with the loss of carbon-absorbing forests that are felled to open grazing areas.
Immense amounts of water are also needed to sustain the livestock.
"The evidence is clear, our food system needs to be transformed for the sake of our planet and the future of humankind," said WEF International head Marco Lambertini in a statement.
"We are the last generation that can do something about this before the system collapses."
--------------------
Drop beef and save millions of lives, slash emissions: WEF
January 3, 2019, Phys.org
Switching from beef to alternative proteins could save millions of lives and dramatically slash greenhouse gas emissions, the World Economic Forum said Thursday.
New research conducted by the Oxford Martin School for WEF showed that efforts to replace meat and especially beef could provide huge benefits for human health and the environment.
The organisation, famous for the plush gathering of the world's rich, famous and influential at the luxury Swiss ski resort of Davos each January, said 2.4 percent of global diet-related deaths could be avoided by moving away from beef.
And for wealthier countries, a full five percent of such deaths could be avoided, according to the shool's white paper "Alternative proteins".
"The most positive effects are found in wealthier countries, where beef consumption is high and where there is a particular benefit of consuming more fibre," it found.
The paper did not provide figures on how many people are estimated to die annually from diet-related causes, nor what diseases or conditions were included in that category, but WEF maintained that switching from meat "could prevent millions of unnecessary deaths per year."
It also pointed out that demand for meat is projected to keep growing even as the global population is predicted to swell to 10 billion around the middle of this century.
Not sustainable
"It will be impossible to sustainably satisfy the world's future demand for meat," WEF managing director Dominic Waughray said in the statement.
He stressed that "innovation in products, improvements in how we produce beef, pork and chicken, and an effort on the part of the consumer to embrace a more diverse diet," could make it possible to improve global health, even without giving up meat altogether.
The report analysed 13 sources of protein, including beef, pork and chicken, along with fruits and vegetables such as beans, processed non-animal substitutes like tofu, and novel products including insects.
It found that switching from meat to alternative proteins could have both a negative and a positive effect on nutrient intake, but that overall, increasing consumption of alternatives offered health improvements.
Beans, mycoprotein and peas offered the biggest health boost, with the possibility to reduce mortality rates by up to seven percent, it found.
The white paper also highlighted 2010 data showing that beef production alone accounts for a quarter of all food-related greenhouse gas emissions, stressing that soaring protein demand could put huge pressure on the environment unless alternatives are found.
Livestock farming poses a triple threat to Earth's atmosphere, as animals produce huge amounts of the greenhouse gas methane, coupled with the loss of carbon-absorbing forests that are felled to open grazing areas.
Immense amounts of water are also needed to sustain the livestock.
"The evidence is clear, our food system needs to be transformed for the sake of our planet and the future of humankind," said WEF International head Marco Lambertini in a statement.
"We are the last generation that can do something about this before the system collapses."
--------------------