Dr. Stephen Lanka proving through controlled experiments, in a court of law, that the virus theory is false.
https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f
Four things that are very important for people to understand which is about virology and the lack of evidence for viruses.
So, the first thing to understand is their claim of isolation where they use impure samples taken from patients that they put into cell cultures with toxic agents and foreign genetic material where they starve the cells of nutrients.
They then look for the cytopathic effect to occur which is essentially the death of the cells and the virologists falsely call that isolation which is obviously the total opposite because nothing is being isolated and separated from everything else and these experiments also lack the proper control experiments.
This unscientific method became the central method of virology in 1954 because of a man named John Franklin Enders that attempted to prove the existence of the measles virus.
This study from 1954 with Enders was also one of 6 studies that was used in a German measles court trial 2016 against a German virologist named Dr. Stefan Lanka who challenged the existence of the measles virus.
Dr. Lanka won in court in the end and proved that this study is not scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus and because of this decision by the court it also removed the basis of virology since all following cell culture experiments after 1954 have been using the same method.
During the measles court trial Dr. Lanka also set up proper control experiments by contacting two independent laboratories that up to that point had never been done before and they showed that the cytopathic effect that occur which is the death of the cells, is a direct result of the use of antibiotics and starvation of cells and that the cytopathic effect has nothing to do with any alleged virus in the sample.
The third thing to understand is that you cannot prove that any particles are responsible for anything in a cell culture unless you have first proven that the particles exist by isolation and purification before the experiment has taken place.
The two reasons why are very simple and really common sense:
1. The particles you think may be viruses in the cell culture could have come from all other genetic material in the cell culture and not from the sample.
2. The particles could have been created as a result of the experiment itself and has nothing to do with the sample used in the experiment which the control experiments during the measles court trial in 2016 showed.
The fourth thing to understand which is relevant to what is happening now is that currently there are over 60 responses to Freedom of Information requests and inquiries from various institutions in 11 countries around the world and they all say the same thing which is that there is no documentation for an isolation and purification of SARS-CoV-2 directly from a person.
They all refer to the use of cell cultures.
These four points makes it very clear that currently there is no pandemic; there never was.
All current recommendations, policies and pandemic laws, they are all based on the virus and they lack justification and scientific evidence and should not be followed and instead be rejected.
It is time for humanity to stop being afraid of non-existent viruses and instead start to stand up for our basic and fundamental human rights because our future depends on it and remember, all that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to nothing.
There can't be variants of something that doesn't exist.
They have yet to prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2. So, no there can't be a true pandemic.
Here are two compilation pdfs containing ~60 responses from 47 institutions in 10 countries re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2” last updated
February 12, 2021:
Part 1:
Part 2:
Here are some other interesting Freedom of Information (FOI) requests in regards to other alleged "viruses" that people may not be aware of.
The truth is that the method they use to claim isolation which is the use of cell cultures is used for all alleged "viruses" and has been since 1954 which means that all claims of isolation of "viruses" are false.
December 30, 2020
CDC has no record of "SARS-COV-1" or ANY "common-cold coronavirus" having been isolated anywhere ever;
FOIA response dated December 30, 2020. This relates to "COVID-19" because the alleged "SARS-COV-1" is very much a part of the "SARS-COV-2" story.
January 21, 2021
New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research once again equates “isolation” with culturing and this time admits to having no record re isolation of “SARS-COV-1” or (once again) any “virus” on NZ’s "Immunisation" Schedule.
And, they simply ignored a query re isolation of any “common cold coronavirus”:
February 4, 2021
Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO ("Australia's national science research agency") admits to having no record describing the isolation of ANY virus on Australia’s national "immunization" schedule, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
March 15, 2021
CDC FOIA response: no records of any "Ebolavirus" isolation/purification by anyone, anywhere, ever (pdf attached):
March 19, 2021 U.S. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) admit they have no record of any "Zika virus" isolated/purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever:
-----